November 2009
Monthly Archive
Best Practices for Terminal Digit Filing
Nov 18, 2009 02:55 pm |
posted by
Kevin Heubusch |
HIM operations
Paper doesn’t get the publicity these days, but maintaining current and legacy paper-based health records continues to be important to day-to-day HIM operations. Understanding how to file, retrieve, and maintain paper records—especially across multiple locations, such as offsite storage—remains a core function in many departments.
Most HIM departments file by terminal digits, which is the only way to keep files expanding at an even rate. In a terminal digit filing system the last two, three, or four digits of the file number are treated as a single number. Since all numbers in the file are sorted by their ending digits, each section contains approximately the same number of folders, so the file shelves are divided for easy expansion.
A new, free toolkit from AHIMA offers best practices in terminal digit filing. Managers can use the kit to train new or existing staff by having employees review the kit and complete the exercises.
Putting ICD Updates on Ice
One step to help the industry make the transition to ICD-10-CM/PCS will be temporarily suspending updates to the code set as the October 2013 deadline gets closer.
Freezing both the current ICD-9-CM and the new ICD-10-CM/PCS code sets will save organizations further cost and complexity by enabling them to focus on the system change without simultaneously managing code updates. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has been receiving recommendations on whether to freeze the code sets and, if so, for how long.
In a recently released statement, AHIMA recommends that:
- The final ICD-9-CM update should be FY 2012 (beginning October 2011, in conjunction with the federal government’s fiscal year).
- No updates should be made to ICD-10-CM/PCS for FY 2013 or FY 2014 (i.e., beginning October 2012).
- Updates to ICD-10-CM/PCS should resume in FY 2015 (October 2014). (more…)
More E-Signature Resources
Organizations can find further guidance on developing electronic signature policies in the online version of the November–December practice brief “Electronic Signature, Attestation, and Authorship (Updated).”
The online version includes five separate appendixes, linked at the end of the brief:
- Appendix A excerpts portions of the HL7 EHR-System Records Management and Evidentiary Support Functional Profile Standard, which can be used to develop proposals for selecting an EHR system or as a checklist to evaluate current applications for basic record management functionality.
- Appendix B lists the various e-signature laws, regulations, and acts that organizations can refer to in developing and implementing e-signature functionality and policy.
- Appendix C outlines a sample e-signature model policy template, including important legal and compliance recommendations.
- Appendix D provides a glossary of terms that organizations can use in their e-signature policies.
- Appendix E provides practice guidance on making amendments, corrections, and deletions in transcribed reports.
Managing e-signatures is complex, but doing it correctly is critical in supporting an organization’s legal health record. Successfully implementing and using e-signatures requires proper attention to individual system functionality, regulatory requirements, and organizational policy.
More Delays for the Red Flags Rule
Nov 02, 2009 01:06 pm |
posted by
Kevin Heubusch |
Privacy and security
The Federal Trade Commission has announced a new delay for the Red Flags Rule. Enforcement will now begin June 1, 2010.
The delay, announced October 30, comes at the request of Congressional members, the FTC said. The rule was scheduled to go into effect November 1.
The announcement comes a week after the House of Representatives passed an amendment to the rule that would exclude certain businesses, including small healthcare, accounting, and legal practices. The House bill is currently in the Senate.
On the day FTC announced the delay, the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the FTC may not apply the Red Flags Rule to attorneys.
This is the fourth delay for the rule, which was originally scheduled to take effect November 1, 2008. Industry groups, including healthcare providers and lawyers, have pushed for an exclusion, while others have complained that the rule lacked sufficient detail and guidance. The FTC has since been adding information and guidance online.
Exposing Double Identity at Patient Registration
Nov 01, 2009 08:03 am |
posted by
Chris Dimick |
Data quality &
HIM operations
Keeping the organization’s master patient index clean leads some HIM departments all the way back to patient registration, where they collaborate to prevent errors before care starts. Accurate registration helps keep patient data complete and clean as it moves throughout the organization.
Long-term trouble can start during a brief check-in. A rushed or incomplete search of the organization’s MPI can cause clinical registrars to create duplicate patient records or even select the wrong record.
Faulty information entered at check-in streams straight through the system, risking treatment errors and leading to eventual billing problems. Entities that participate in health information exchange will export bad information into their networks.
Error-ridden MPIs also hamper an organization’s ability to understand its patient population and its own performance, both for internal and external reporting. Patient information spread across multiple records can distort measures of patient severity and overall risk of mortality. And correcting errors consumes time.
HIM departments often are the hub of identifying and mitigating registration errors. HIM staff sift through the MPI, merging duplicate records and separating out information that has been overlaid into the wrong patient account. (more…)
Journal of AHIMA – Nov-Dec 2009
Nov 01, 2009 08:00 am |
posted by
Meg Featheringham |
In the magazine
The cover story in the November-December Journal examines how healthcare organizations can plan to resolve the anticipated influx of disputed information in EHRs and PHRs. Other features outline downtime planning for health IT systems and the project to transition MS-DRGs to ICD-10-CM/PCS.
(more…)