<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shadowing Physicians for Documentation Improvement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journal.ahima.org/2009/09/01/shadowing-physicians-for-documentation-improvement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journal.ahima.org/2009/09/01/shadowing-physicians-for-documentation-improvement/</link>
	<description>The Journal of AHIMA is published monthly by the American Health Information Management Association</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:33:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://journal.ahima.org/2009/09/01/shadowing-physicians-for-documentation-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-16897</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journal.ahima.org/?p=970#comment-16897</guid>
		<description>Coders should absolutely go into the patient rooms. I embarked on a similar project at my workplace and shockingly I found that some physicians were documenting physical exam areas they didn&#039;t examine. I was able to stop them right then and there from over-documenting. (Example: physician had PEERL defaulted in an EMR template, but didn&#039;t check for that on every patient). I&#039;m certain this is a wide-spread problem, especially with EMRs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coders should absolutely go into the patient rooms. I embarked on a similar project at my workplace and shockingly I found that some physicians were documenting physical exam areas they didn&#8217;t examine. I was able to stop them right then and there from over-documenting. (Example: physician had PEERL defaulted in an EMR template, but didn&#8217;t check for that on every patient). I&#8217;m certain this is a wide-spread problem, especially with EMRs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margi Brown, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CCDS</title>
		<link>http://journal.ahima.org/2009/09/01/shadowing-physicians-for-documentation-improvement/comment-page-1/#comment-11171</link>
		<dc:creator>Margi Brown, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CCDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journal.ahima.org/?p=970#comment-11171</guid>
		<description>Physician shadowing could be the ultimate win-win for the hospital AND the doc.  Real time review could also provide help with the physician side of documentation and coding. It would also be an ongoing learning experience for the CDS as well.  Great article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Physician shadowing could be the ultimate win-win for the hospital AND the doc.  Real time review could also provide help with the physician side of documentation and coding. It would also be an ongoing learning experience for the CDS as well.  Great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
